Skip to main content
· 10/4/2010

Hunter v. Tamez

Citations

  • 622 F.3d 427
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 20435
  • 2010 WL 3835880

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that presumption applied though federal sentence was decided first
  • “[A] COA is not peau to 12/13 appeal the denial of a § 2241 petition.” (quoting Pack, 218 F.3d at 451 n.3)
  • BOP not required to give effect to the state sentencing court’s direction that state sentence run concurrently with already-imposed federal sentence
  • unless the district court specifies otherwise, sentences imposed at different times are presumed to run consecutively
  • “We may affirm the district court’s denial of [§ 2241] relief on any ground supported by the record.”
  • “[A] COA is not required to . appeal the denial of a § 2241 petition.” (quoting Pack v Yusuff, 218 □□□□□ 448, 451 n3 (Sth Cit, 2000))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Reavley, Haynes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.