L.B. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he exclusion here was not for a small portion of cumulative evidence but for a substantial portion of the proceedings, including the entire case-in-chief for the State during the adjudicatory hearing. The parents’ exclusion ... was not harmless.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• C.T.S. v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2003-01-29· cited 54×
• A.E.B. v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2001-10-03· cited 37×
• J.R. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-29· cited 6×
• L.E.D. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-11-24· cited 2×
• CTS v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2003-01-29
• AEB v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2001-10-03
• LB v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1996-12-23
• R.D.H. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-03-16

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re GAULT
  Supreme Court· 1967-05-15· cited 5,473×
• D. C. A. v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1975-06-24· cited 36×
• State v. Ostrowski
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1972-04-26· cited 27×
• Town of Merrillville v. Merrillville Conservancy District Ex Rel. Board of Directors
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1995-04-13· cited 21×
• Walker v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1993-02-09· cited 14×
• Gage v. Bozarth
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1987-03-17· cited 12×
• In Re Interest of Akers
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1974-02-21· cited 12×
• Beldon v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1995-11-21· cited 6×
• Jenkins v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1992-07-29· cited 4×
• State v. Gorzelanny
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1984-09-27· cited 3×