J.R. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the rule of sequestration does not authorize excluding a juvenile’s parents from hearings in juvenile delinquency proceedings”
• “Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.010(a) contemplates parents’ participation as parties at detention hearings unless they ‘cannot be located[.]’” (footnote omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Benjamin v. Tandem Healthcare, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-06-27· cited 6×
• L.E.D. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-11-24· cited 2×
• SHARRON TASHA FORD v. CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-08-04
• R.D.H. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-03-16
• J.R. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-05-16
• A.P. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-06-14

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re GAULT
  Supreme Court· 1967-05-15· cited 5,473×
• D. C. A. v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1975-06-24· cited 36×
• State v. Ostrowski
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1972-04-26· cited 27×
• Hopkins v. Youth Court of Issaquena County
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1969-10-20· cited 19×
• Fisher v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-02-14· cited 13×
• Land v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1960-04-05· cited 12×
• In Re Interest of Akers
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1974-02-21· cited 12×
• L.B. v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1996-12-23· cited 9×
• State Ex Rel. Vm
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2003-10-30· cited 5×
• Harnum v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-06-18· cited 5×