Skip to main content
· 8/2/2006

Kaucher v. County of Bucks

Citations

  • 455 F.3d 418
  • 2006 WL 2136542

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming summary judg- ment for defendants on corrections officer’s substantive due process claim that dangerous conditions at jail caused dangerous infection
  • “The fourth element of the state created danger test asks whether a defendant exercised his or her authority to create a foreseeably dangerous situation.”
  • “[A] specific and deliberate exercise of state authority, while necessary to satisfy the fourth element of the test, is not sufficient. There must be a direct causal relationship between the affirmative act of the state and plaintiffs harm.”
  • “negligent behavior can never rise to the level of conscience shocking”
  • “An issue is genuine only if there is a sufficient evidentiary basis on which a reasonable jury could find for the non-moving party, and a factual dispute is material only if it might affect the outcome of the suit under governing law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scirica, Barry, Fisher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.