Layman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The contemporaneous objections rule is satisfied under the facts of this case because the trial court clearly understood the defendant's position and further debate would have been futile\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Avila v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-01-17· cited 24×
• Pulcini v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-07-21· cited 10×
• State v. Roberts
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-06-20· cited 9×
• Harmon v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-08-08· cited 6×
• Gibbs v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-06-27· cited 5×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-10-17· cited 5×
• Dessett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-03-07· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. DiGuilio
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
• Larzelere v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-07-11· cited 127×
• Pacifico v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-09-29· cited 51×
• Spurlock v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1982-10-07· cited 16×
• Long v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-10-15· cited 15×
• Brown v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-08-28· cited 14×