Skip to main content

Harmon v. State

Citations

  • 854 So. 2d 697
  • 2003 WL 21817494

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the first prong met where the declarant “made the statement as he emerged from a bloody fight, an event startling enough to cause nervous excitement”
  • “Simply because the statement may be self-serving is not a sufficient basis to exclude it [under the excited utterance exception].”
  • the excited utterance of the defendant would have been admissible, but holding that the trial court properly excluded it because there was no showing of relevancy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Orfinger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.