District Court of Appeal of Florida· 8/8/2003
Harmon v. State
Citations
- 854 So. 2d 697
- 2003 WL 21817494
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding the first prong met where the declarant “made the statement as he emerged from a bloody fight, an event startling enough to cause nervous excitement”
- “Simply because the statement may be self-serving is not a sufficient basis to exclude it [under the excited utterance exception].”
- the excited utterance of the defendant would have been admissible, but holding that the trial court properly excluded it because there was no showing of relevancy
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Orfinger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. PavlikCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-12-22· cited 20×
- Blandenburg v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-05· cited 10×
- Viglione v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-12-12· cited 4×
- Dixon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-02-20· cited 1×
- BRANDON HINCK v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-12-05
- Bryant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-10-17
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Steinhorst v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-03-04· cited 391×
- Larzelere v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-07-11· cited 127×
- Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-06-13· cited 105×
- State v. JanoSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-05-05· cited 76×
- Penn v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-01-15· cited 38×
- Eberhardt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-09-26· cited 31×
- Alexander v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-11-12· cited 9×
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-04-12· cited 8×
- Layman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-12· cited 7×
- Donley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-06-04· cited 7×
- Stiles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-03-20· cited 6×
- Sweet v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-23· cited 5×
- Pedrosa v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-14· cited 3×
- Gilliam v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-07-22· cited 3×
- Tucker v. Allstate Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-04-23· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.