Laxalt v. McClatchy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• withholding discovery where minimal relevance outweighed by privacy & confidentiality interest
• “The standards for nonparty discovery… require a stronger showing of 4 relevance than for simple party discovery.”
• “The standards for 2 nonparty discovery… require a stronger showing of relevance than for simple party 3 discovery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Federal Trade Commission v. AMG Services, Inc.
  D. Nevada· 2013-05-24· cited 52×
• Hasbrouck v. BankAmerica Housing Services
  N.D. New York· 1999-08-04· cited 25×
• Addamax Corp. v. Open Software Foundation, Inc.
  D. Massachusetts· 1993-04-29· cited 18×
• Stamy v. Packer
  D. New Jersey· 1990-07-26· cited 16×
• In re Letters Rogatory of the Federal Capital of the Argentinean Republic
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1992-11-02· cited 10×
• Adelson v. Smith (In Re Smith)
  D. Nevada· 2008-10-29· cited 9×
• Bio-Vita, Ltd. v. Biopure Corp.
  D. Massachusetts· 1991-07-17· cited 4×
• Bell v. Board of Education
  S.D. West Virginia· 2004-12-03· cited 3×
• Adelson v. Smith (In Re Smith)
  D. Nevada· 2008-10-14· cited 1×
• Blount International, Ltd. v. Schuylkill Energy Resources Inc.
  D. Massachusetts· 1989-04-19· cited 1×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hickman v. Taylor
  Supreme Court· 1947-01-13· cited 4,981×
• United States v. Reynolds
  Supreme Court· 1953-03-09· cited 873×
• Federal Trade Commission v. Warner Communications Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1984-09-13· cited 198×
• Nixon v. Sirica
  D.C. Circuit· 1973-10-12· cited 189×
• Save Our Invaluable Land (Soil), Inc. v. Needham
  Supreme Court· 1977-03-28· cited 175×
• Phoenix Ins. Co. v. Doster
  Supreme Court· 1882-10-23· cited 129×
• Banco Credito Agricola de Cartago v. Allied Bank International
  Supreme Court· 1985-09-23· cited 94×
• Dart Industries Company, Inc., Movant-Appellee v. Westwood Chemical Company, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1980-04-02· cited 92×
• United States v. Leggett & Platt, Inc.
  Sixth Circuit· 1976-09-29· cited 72×
• Kyle Engineering Co. v. Kleppe
  Ninth Circuit· 1979-07-03· cited 36×
• Collins & Aikman Corp. v. J. P. Stevens & Co.
  D. South Carolina· 1971-01-04· cited 24×
• United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
  District of Columbia· 1981-10-09· cited 20×
• Slater Steel, Inc. v. Vac-Air Alloys Corp.
  W.D. New York· 1985-05-31· cited 7×
• United States v. CBS, Inc.
  C.D. California· 1984-09-21· cited 6×
• Rockwell International, Inc. v. Pos-a-traction Industries, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1983-08-10· cited 3×