Skip to main content
· 7/8/2004

Lavallee v. Coplan

Citations

  • 374 F.3d 41
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 14097
  • 2004 WL 1530356

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing traditional Brady doctrine and acknowledging court review requirement under Pennsylvania v. Richie, 480 U.S. 39 (1987)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Porfilio, Lynch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.