District Court of Appeal of Florida· 8/23/2013
Laurito v. State
Citations
- 120 So. 3d 203
- 2013 WL 4483057
- 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 13446
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the question “Can I make a phone call so I can get a lawyer?” when asked immediately after an officer gave the Miranda warnings was an unequivocal request for counsel
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cohen, Griffin, Lawson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-06-24· cited 2,777×
- McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1991-06-13· cited 1,818×
- Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1984-12-10· cited 1,225×
- Almeida v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-07-08· cited 85×
- United States v. TaftD. Vermont· 1991-06-17· cited 18×
- State v. DahlenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-11-01· cited 17×
- Anthony v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-17· cited 11×
- Bean v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-01-07· cited 7×
- State v. SotoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-04-18· cited 6×
- United States v. HughesD. Arizona· 1996-03-29· cited 2×
- Duhart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-02-14· cited 1×
Other cases named Laurito v. State
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.