Anthony v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a motion to suppress only preserves for appeal the specific grounds raised in the motion and argued to the trial court, such that trial counsel’s failure to raise a viable suppression issue can be raised in a timely rule 3.850 motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Anthony v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-05-07· cited 7×
• State v. Schlabach
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-01-05· cited 6×
• State v. Modeste
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-08-08· cited 6×
• Rouzard v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-04-18· cited 5×
• Louis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-02-07· cited 3×
• Laurito v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-08-23· cited 3×
• Burgess v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-10-03· cited 1×
• McGill v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-15· cited 1×
• Burgess v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-09· cited 1×
• Hall v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-01-09
• Phillips v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-09-06

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Ramirez v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-07-08· cited 250×
• Roberts v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-05-26· cited 61×
• State v. West
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2005-01-05· cited 15×
• Stancle v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-12-07· cited 13×
• Martelus v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-01· cited 7×