Skip to main content
· 5/28/2004

Laubach v. Roberts

Citations

  • 90 P.3d 961
  • 32 Kan. App. 2d 863
  • 2004 Kan. App. LEXIS 542

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • construing strict compliance with the exhaustion requirement to mean simply that all necessary documents are attached
  • petition properly treated as request for habeas corpus relief under K.S.A. 60-1501 where petitioner made general complaints about conditions of confinement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rulon, Hill, Wahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.