Skip to main content
· 6/5/1998

Stansbury v. Hannigan

Citations

  • 960 P.2d 227
  • 265 Kan. 404
  • 1998 Kan. LEXIS 375

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding similar statutory amendment was retrospective when applied to inmate who committed his crime before amendment’s enactment
  • holding similar statutory amendment violated Ex Post Facto Clause when applied to inmate who committed his crime before enactment of amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, McFarland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.