Second Circuit· 3/26/2007
Lattanzio v. Comta
Citations
- 481 F.3d 137
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a pro se plaintiff cannot represent a sole member or solely-owned limited liability company
- holding that an LLC may only appear in federal court through a licensed attorney
- holding that corporate entities such as LLCs “must appear through licensed counsel’
- explaining that partnerships, corporations, and limited liability companies “may appear in federal court only through a licensed attorney”
- explaining that “separate legal entit[ies]” such as corporations and limited liability companies “may appear in federal court only through a licensed attorney”
- explaining that “a limited liability company [] may appear in federal court only through a licensed attorney.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- City of New York v. Mickalis Pawn Shop, LLCSecond Circuit· 2011-05-04· cited 1,026×
- Berrios v. New York City Housing AuthoritySecond Circuit· 2009-04-23· cited 261×
- Guest v. HansenSecond Circuit· 2010-04-20· cited 123×
- Steinhausen v. HomeServices of Neb.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2015-01-23· cited 44×
- Williams v. SavoryS.D. New York· 2015-01-07· cited 32×
- Vick v. WongE.D. Virginia· 2009-08-05· cited 29×
- David R. Nicholson, Builder, LLC v. JablonskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-05-19· cited 27×
- Smith v. Rustic Home Builders, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2013-01-17· cited 15×
- Allan B. Mendelsohn of the Estate v. Kovalchuk (In re Apco Merch. Servs., Inc.)E.D. New York· 2018-03-26· cited 10×
- In re 231 Fourth Avenue Lyceum, LLCE.D. New York· 2014-07-17· cited 7×
- Zapata v. McHughNebraska Supreme Court· 2017-03-31· cited 6×
- Hinckley Square Associates v. Leah D. CerveneCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2015-11-09· cited 2×
- Schmunk v. Aquatic SolutionsNebraska Court of Appeals· 2021-06-08· cited 2×
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. East Delta Resources Corp.Second Circuit· 2014-01-14· cited 2×
- In re Ideal Mortgage Bankers, Ltd.E.D. New York· 2015-10-14· cited 2×
- RLI Insurance Co. v. JDJ Marine, Inc.Second Circuit· 2013-05-10· cited 1×
- Messer ex rel. FKF Trust v. GMR, LLC (In re FKF 3, LLC)S.D. New York· 2013-03-13· cited 1×
- United States v. FlahertySecond Circuit· 2008-08-19
- Garcia v. FernandezHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2020-06-04
- Employment Law Group, P.C. v. San Diego Employment Law GroupDistrict of Columbia· 2021-09-02
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court· 1993-01-12· cited 2,320×
- Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.Supreme Court· 1990-02-20· cited 665×
- Eagle Associates v. Bank of MontrealSecond Circuit· 1991-02-11· cited 394×
- Lattanzio v. ComtaSecond Circuit· 2007-03-26· cited 302×
- Covington v. City of New YorkSecond Circuit· 1999-03-18· cited 185×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,038 Randolph Phillips v. John E. Tobin, Ralph K. Gottshall, and Alleghany CorporationSecond Circuit· 1976-12-16· cited 133×
- National Independent Theatre Exhibitors, Inc., James T. Patterson, Sr., Screen Advertising Film Fund, Inc. v. Buena Vista Distribution CompanyEleventh Circuit· 1985-02-05· cited 113×
- United States of America and Mary Jane Sciascia, Revenue Agent v. Dr. Martin FoxSecond Circuit· 1983-10-19· cited 59×
- Mercu-Ray Industries, Inc. v. Bristol-Myers CompanyS.D. New York· 1974-06-25· cited 46×
- Gilley v. ShoffnerM.D. North Carolina· 2004-11-18· cited 35×
- Bischoff v. Boar's Head Provisions Co., Inc.S.D. New York· 2006-06-29· cited 18×
- Kipp v. Royal & Sun Alliance Personal Insurance CompanyE.D. Wisconsin· 2002-07-17· cited 15×
- Harold Wapnick v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSecond Circuit· 2004-04-16· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.