· 12/16/1976
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,038 Randolph Phillips v. John E. Tobin, Ralph K. Gottshall, and Alleghany Corporation
Citations
- 548 F.2d 408
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a non-attorney could not appear pro se to conduct a shareholder's derivative suit
- holding that a non-attorney could not appear pro se to conduct a shareholder's derivative suit
- holding that a non-attorney could not appear pro se to conduct a shareholder’s derivative suit
- holding that a non-attorney could not appear pro se to conduct a shareholder’s derivative suit
- holding that a non-attorney could not appear pro se to conduct a shareholder’s derivative suit
- holding that a non-attorney could not appear pro se to conduct a shareholder’s derivative suit
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Waterman, Meskill, Bartels
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.