Skip to main content
· 12/16/1976

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,038 Randolph Phillips v. John E. Tobin, Ralph K. Gottshall, and Alleghany Corporation

Citations

  • 548 F.2d 408

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a non-attorney could not appear pro se to conduct a shareholder's derivative suit
  • holding that a non-attorney could not appear pro se to conduct a shareholder's derivative suit
  • holding that a non-attorney could not appear pro se to conduct a shareholder’s derivative suit
  • holding that a non-attorney could not appear pro se to conduct a shareholder’s derivative suit
  • holding that a non-attorney could not appear pro se to conduct a shareholder’s derivative suit
  • holding that a non-attorney could not appear pro se to conduct a shareholder’s derivative suit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Waterman, Meskill, Bartels

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.