S.D. New York· 2/21/1984
Laterza v. American Broadcasting Co., Inc.
Citations
- 581 F. Supp. 408
- 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19320
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Plaintiffs, in amending their complaint, are directed to allege with supporting factual allegations how each of the individual [defendants] participated as an aider or abettor in the requisite two predicate acts.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Werker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Haroco, Inc. v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, Walter E. Heller International Corporation, & Ronald J. GrayheckSeventh Circuit· 1985-01-14· cited 590×
- Petro-Tech, Inc. v. Western Co. of North AmericaThird Circuit· 1987-07-13· cited 105×
- United States v. CastellanoS.D. New York· 1985-06-06· cited 91×
- Zola v. GordonS.D. New York· 1988-05-04· cited 85×
- Friedman v. Arizona World Nurseries Ltd. PartnershipS.D. New York· 1990-01-24· cited 78×
- Department of Economic Development v. Arthur Andersen & Co.S.D. New York· 1996-04-02· cited 72×
- Allington v. CarpenterC.D. California· 1985-08-29· cited 68×
- United States v. Bonanno Organized Crime Family of La Cosa NostraE.D. New York· 1988-03-24· cited 62×
- In Re Sahlen & Associates, Inc. Securities LitigationS.D. Florida· 1991-07-10· cited 59×
- Alfaro v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1985-04-01· cited 54×
- McLendon v. Continental Group, Inc.D. New Jersey· 1985-01-22· cited 46×
- Morrow v. BlackE.D. New York· 1990-07-03· cited 39×
- Andreo v. Friedlander, Gaines, Cohen, Rosenthal & RosenbergD. Connecticut· 1987-05-12· cited 38×
- Department of Economic Development v. Arthur Andersen & Co. (U.S.A.)S.D. New York· 1988-04-05· cited 37×
- Department of Economic Development v. Arthur Andersen & Co. (U.S.A.)S.D. New York· 1990-01-08· cited 32×
- Morin v. TrupinS.D. New York· 1990-09-29· cited 32×
- Alvers v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1986-02-18· cited 32×
- General Accident Insurance v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1984-10-25· cited 31×
- Moll v. US Life Title Ins. Co. of New YorkS.D. New York· 1987-02-17· cited 30×
- Hayden v. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & GarrisonS.D. New York· 1997-02-20· cited 28×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court· 1981-06-17· cited 2,648×
- Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-05-31· cited 977×
- Michael E. Moss v. Morgan Stanley Inc., E. Jacques Courtois, Jr., Adrian Antoniu, and James M. Newman, Morgan Stanley Inc. And James M. NewmanSecond Circuit· 1983-09-09· cited 535×
- Delph v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-11-06· cited 338×
- United States v. ElliottFifth Circuit· 1978-04-21· cited 305×
- United States v. Benjamin Ruggiero, Nicholas Santora, Anthony Rabito, and Antonio TomasuloSecond Circuit· 1984-01-18· cited 229×
- United States v. MartinoFifth Circuit· 1981-06-19· cited 225×
- United States v. BrightFifth Circuit· 1980-07-11· cited 221×
- United States v. KopitukEleventh Circuit· 1982-11-04· cited 185×
- United States v. Eric StanchichSecond Circuit· 1977-01-06· cited 135×
- United States v. Marisa Lemm, United States of America v. Phyllis Ellen Stonys, United States of America v. Val Bolton MagheeEighth Circuit· 1982-06-15· cited 131×
- Bache Halsey Stuart Shields Inc. v. Tracy Collins Bank & Trust Co.D. Utah· 1983-02-14· cited 42×
- United States v. Cheryl Melton, United States of America v. Marion ComadollSeventh Circuit· 1982-09-22· cited 35×
- United States v. Shelby SchwartzEleventh Circuit· 1982-01-22· cited 27×
- Richardson v. Shearson/American Express Co., Inc.S.D. New York· 1983-03-29· cited 22×
- United States v. Russell DickersonSecond Circuit· 1975-01-06· cited 16×
- United States v. Arnell SmithFifth Circuit· 1980-11-24· cited 13×
- King v. LasherS.D. New York· 1983-08-16· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.