· 4/5/1988
Department of Economic Development v. Arthur Andersen & Co. (U.S.A.)
Citations
- 683 F. Supp. 1463
- 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2781
- 1988 WL 33757
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- controlling question of law may exist if “the certified issue has precedential value for a large number of cases”
- the possibility of rescission, a latent remedy in any contract, does not determine when the purchase or sale of the security occurred
- connection element requires that securities transaction “ ‘was an integral or helpful component of the fraudulent scheme.’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.