Skip to main content
· 4/5/1988

Department of Economic Development v. Arthur Andersen & Co. (U.S.A.)

Citations

  • 683 F. Supp. 1463
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2781
  • 1988 WL 33757

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • controlling question of law may exist if “the certified issue has precedential value for a large number of cases”
  • the possibility of rescission, a latent remedy in any contract, does not determine when the purchase or sale of the security occurred
  • connection element requires that securities transaction “ ‘was an integral or helpful component of the fraudulent scheme.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.