Skip to main content
· 11/12/2010

Tupper v. Roan

Citations

  • 243 P.3d 50
  • 349 Or. 211
  • 2010 Ore. LEXIS 832

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the plaintiff “must show that property or a property interest that rightfully belongs to her was taken or obtained by someone else”
  • explaining that to establish an unjust enrichment claim, the plaintiff must show (1
  • explaining that to establish an unjust enrichment claim, the plaintiff must show (1
  • explaining that an obligation in a dissolution decree “to obtain an insurance policy naming an ex-spouse as beneficiary may confer an equitable interest in a later-acquired policy, if the obligation in some fashion clearly identified that policy as one of its objects”
  • noting in constructive trust context that prior decisions by this court suggest that unjust enrichment may be found even when recipient is innocent
  • noting in constructive trust context that prior decisions by this court suggest that unjust enrichment may be found even when recipient is innocent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gillette

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.