· 11/12/2010
Tupper v. Roan
Citations
- 243 P.3d 50
- 349 Or. 211
- 2010 Ore. LEXIS 832
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the plaintiff “must show that property or a property interest that rightfully belongs to her was taken or obtained by someone else”
- explaining that to establish an unjust enrichment claim, the plaintiff must show (1
- explaining that to establish an unjust enrichment claim, the plaintiff must show (1
- explaining that an obligation in a dissolution decree “to obtain an insurance policy naming an ex-spouse as beneficiary may confer an equitable interest in a later-acquired policy, if the obligation in some fashion clearly identified that policy as one of its objects”
- noting in constructive trust context that prior decisions by this court suggest that unjust enrichment may be found even when recipient is innocent
- noting in constructive trust context that prior decisions by this court suggest that unjust enrichment may be found even when recipient is innocent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gillette
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.