Larsen v. Motor Supply Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to recognize public policy action where employees terminated for refusing to consent to take psychological stress evaluation test
• refusing to recognize public policy action where employees terminated for refusing to consent to take psychological stress evaluation test
• requirement of consent to take a psychological stress evaluation test did not contravene any statute protecting the rights of employees
• requirement of consent to take a psychological stress evaluation test did not contravene any statute protecting the rights of employees
• discharge upheld where at-will employees refused to sign consent to submit to a psychological stress evaluation test
• in the absence of statute, employees' discharge for refusal to consent to take test for deception is not violative of public policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).