Larry v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding evidence that the defendant beat up a prosecution witness is evidence of guilty knowledge and properly admissible under the knowledge exception of Rule 404(b)
• holding evidence that defendant battered witness and called him a “snitch” was admissible under Evidence Rule 404(b) as evidence of “knowledge” or consciousness of guilt
• evidence that defendant called co-defendant a “snitch” and beat co-defendant up admissible under Rule 404(b) to prove defendant’s consciousness of guilt regarding the charged crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Myers v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2008-05-30· cited 42×
• State v. Russell
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2009-12-16· cited 37×
• Dean v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2009-02-27· cited 14×
• Matthews v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-05-23· cited 9×
• DesJardins v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2001-07-03· cited 1×
• Todd A. Stigleman v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-04-27
• Todd Norman v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-08-10

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hardin v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1993-03-29· cited 133×
• Bacher v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1997-10-09· cited 117×
• Minnick v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1989-10-02· cited 59×
• Utley v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1998-09-18· cited 31×
• Thompson v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1996-10-02· cited 30×
• Cox v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1981-06-29· cited 24×
• Poindexter v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1996-05-02· cited 13×
• Scifres-Martin v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1994-06-13· cited 5×