Skip to main content
· 6/13/1994

Scifres-Martin v. State

Citations

  • 635 N.E.2d 218
  • 1994 Ind. App. LEXIS 738
  • 1994 WL 259722

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The manufacture, destruction, or suppression of evidence may be properly considered by the jury as an admission of the defendant’s guilt or his guilty knowledge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robertson, Najam, Friedlander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.