Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 9/13/1989
Langston v. State
Citations
- 776 S.W.2d 586
- 1989 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 162
- 1989 WL 104640
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that records from Kansas were inadmissible because they did not affirmatively show that the defendant was finally convicted of any offense
- concluding that records from Kansas were inadmissible because they did not affirmatively show that the defendant was finally convicted of any offense
- concluding that records from Kansas were inadmissible because they did not affirmatively show that the defendant was finally convicted of any offense
- holding felony convictions from other states may generally be used to enhance punishment
- holding felony convictions from other states may generally be used to enhance punishment
- rejecting argument that “Journal Entry” purporting to sentence appellant for bur glary was functional equivalent of judgment and sentence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clinton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Flowers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-04-18· cited 495×
- Coca-Cola Co. v. Harmar Bottling Co.Texas Supreme Court· 2006-10-20· cited 97×
- Wilson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2000-02-24· cited 57×
- Cox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1996-08-30· cited 44×
- Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-12-09· cited 39×
- Petruccelli v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2005-08-17· cited 37×
- Banks v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2005-03-10· cited 32×
- Tate v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2003-10-16· cited 21×
- Davis v. StateTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 1992-09-30· cited 20×
- Lemuel Anthony McNeil v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2011-11-10· cited 15×
- Martin v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2007-05-03· cited 8×
- Jeromy Gaddy v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2014-05-15· cited 6×
- Lavinge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2001-12-27· cited 4×
- Antonio Leonard Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-06-18· cited 3×
- Lambert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1989-10-25· cited 3×
- Antonio Leonard Brown v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2015-06-19
- Carter Compton, II v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2015-07-31
- the Coca-Cola Company v. Harmar Bottling CompanyTexas Supreme Court· 2006-10-20
- Willover, Craig Jonathan v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2002-08-08
- Wiley Eugene Martin v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2007-05-03
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-06-15· cited 647×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-09-19· cited 244×
- Almand v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-05-12· cited 61×
- McKinney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-02-20· cited 50×
- Morgan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-07-02· cited 43×
- Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-07-06· cited 40×
- Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-12-13· cited 38×
- Aaron v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-02-16· cited 17×
- Ex Parte NicholsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-04-04· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.