Skip to main content
· 2/1/2007

Flowers v. State

Citations

  • 947 So. 2d 910
  • 2007 WL 273491

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that issues not presented to the trial judge are procedurally barred, but when substantial rights are affected, this Court will review the issue under “plain error”
  • reversing on Batson grounds where prosecutors used 100 percent of their peremptory strikes against African Americans
  • One of the prosecutor’s peremptory challenges was deemed pretextual because there was no evidence in the record to support the reason for the strike.
  • \Failure to voir dire as to the characteristic cited for the strike is also an indicator of pretext.\
  • “Failure to voir dire as to the characteristic cited for the strike is also an indicator of pretext.”
  • purported race-neutral reason “highly suspect” when strike not applied to similar juror of opposite race

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: En Banc

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.