Landis v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the crime of stalking by its nature necessitates proof of repeated or continuing acts”
• holding that “the crime of stalking by its nature necessitates proof of repeated or continuing acts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• John Doe v. City of Lafayette, Indiana
  Seventh Circuit· 2004-07-30· cited 106×
• Johnson v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1999-12-29· cited 37×
• Holeton v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2006-09-08· cited 30×
• Spearman v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2001-03-06· cited 30×
• Nasser v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-05-11· cited 16×
• John Doe v. City of Lafayette, Indiana
  Seventh Circuit· 2003-08-08· cited 3×
• Nicholson v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2011-04-29· cited 3×
• Doe, John v. City Lafayette IN
  Seventh Circuit· 2003-06-27
• Doe, John v. City Lafayette IN
  Seventh Circuit· 2004-07-30
• Luis C. Schleiffer v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2018-07-30
• Kimberly J. Brook v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2023-10-20

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Landis v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1998-03-17· cited 6×