Lamb v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “[b]ecause the trial court gave Lamb the impression that she was preserving her right to appeal the ruling on her motion to suppress, we conclude that a finding of dispositiveness can be inferred from the record”
• concluding a finding of dispositiveness could be inferred from the record where the court gave the defendant “the impression that she was preserving her right to appeal the ruling . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Sun
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-06-01· cited 17×
• Shawntavian Tucker v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-08-19· cited 6×
• Bobby L. Saviory v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-09-30
• TIFFANY GRAVES v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2022-01-05

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• M.N. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-08-26· cited 19×
• State v. Tamulonis
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-07-09· cited 15×
• Leisure v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-04-05· cited 11×