Skip to main content

Lamb v. State

Citations

  • 680 S.W.2d 11
  • 1984 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 677

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that affidavits supporting motion for new trial must be offered into evidence
  • holding that affidavits supporting motion for new trial must be offered into evidence
  • concluding there was no evidence to support appellant’s claim the State failed to disclose exculpatory evidence because appellant failed to properly present his motion and offer his supporting affidavits into evidence
  • reviewing “in the interest of justice” allegations in motion for new trial and supporting affidavit that were never introduced into evidence at a hearing
  • reviewing “in the interest of justice” allegations in motion for new trial and supporting affidavit that were never introduced into evidence at a hearing
  • reviewing \in the interest of justice\ allegations in motion for new trial and supporting affidavit that were never introduced into evidence at a hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell, Onion, Teague, Clinton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Lamb v. State

145 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.