Lake v. Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[t]here is no question but that [the insurer] and [its insured] were in privity” where the insurer’s claim was “based upon its contractual right of subrogation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hartsel Springs Ranch of Colorado, Inc. v. Bluegreen Corp.
  Tenth Circuit· 2002-07-16· cited 114×
• Warner v. German
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-04-29· cited 45×
• Landry v. Luscher
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-05-25· cited 44×
• United Book Press, Inc. v. Maryland Composition Co.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-12-03· cited 20×
• Fisher v. State Farm General Insurance
  Montana Supreme Court· 1999-12-09· cited 18×
• Poteet v. Sauter
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-02-01· cited 18×
• Ifill v. District of Columbia
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-09-07· cited 17×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. Endsley
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1928-12-08· cited 49×
• Dill v. Avery
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-01-13· cited 14×
• Vane v. C. Hoffberger Company
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1950-12-07· cited 13×