· 12/5/1991
Lake v. Jones
Citations
- 598 A.2d 858
- 89 Md. App. 579
- 1991 Md. App. LEXIS 242
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “[t]here is no question but that [the insurer] and [its insured] were in privity” where the insurer’s claim was “based upon its contractual right of subrogation”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alpert, Bloom, Wenner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.