Skip to main content
· 12/5/1991

Lake v. Jones

Citations

  • 598 A.2d 858
  • 89 Md. App. 579
  • 1991 Md. App. LEXIS 242

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[t]here is no question but that [the insurer] and [its insured] were in privity” where the insurer’s claim was “based upon its contractual right of subrogation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alpert, Bloom, Wenner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.