Lachenmyer v. Didrickson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A reviewing court should not substitute its judgment for that of the agency unless the record lacks substantial evidence in support of the agency’s findings”
• “[w]illful conduct stems from an employee’s awareness of and conscious disregard for, a company rule”
• “[w]illful conduct stems from an employee’s awareness of and conscious disregard for, a company rule”
• “Willful behavior stems from employee awareness of a company rule that is disregarded by the employee”
• \A reviewing court should not substitute its judgment for that of the agency unless the record lacks substantial evidence in support of the agency's findings\
• “[w]ilful behavior stems from employee awareness of a company rule that is disregarded by the employee”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).