Homefinders, Inc. v. City of Evanston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a complaint filed under the Administrative Review Law’s predecessor, where the Administrative Review Law’s predecessor did not apply, was sufficient to warrant treatment as a common-law writ of certiorari
• “administrative bodies have only such powers as are conferred upon them by statute or ordinance”
• “even though the administrative agency’s decision was not subject to review under the provisions of the Administrative Review Act, it was nevertheless reviewable by common law certiorari”
• “administrative bodies have only such powers as are conferred upon them by statute or ordinance”
• “[t]he requirements of due process are met if the decision-making board considers the evidence contained in the report of proceedings before the hearing officer and bases its determinations thereon”
• “even though the administrative agency’s decision was not subject to review under the provisions of the Administrative Review Act, it was nevertheless reviewable by common law certiorari”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).