Finik v. Department of Employment Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] mailing may be proved by evidence of an office custom together with corroborating circumstances showing that the custom was followed in the particular instance”
• \[A] mailing may be proved by evidence of an office custom together with corroborating circumstances showing that the custom was followed in the particular instance\
• the mere existence of conflicting testimony is not a sufficient basis to reverse an agency's decision as against the manifest weight of the evidence
• \[A] mailing may be proved by evidence of an office custom together with corroborating circumstances showing that the custom was followed in the particular instance\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).