Skip to main content

Luster v. Luster

Citations

  • 17 A.3d 1068
  • 128 Conn. App. 259
  • 2011 Conn. App. LEXIS 217

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • cross complaint for dissolution of marriage by conservators of estate and person on behalf of conserved person with dementia, who was identified in complaint as incompetent
  • “The effect of the plaintiff’s actions in the trial court has been to deny the defendant equal access to the court and to a hearing on relief that he, but not the plaintiff, seeks, solely on the basis of his incompetence.”
  • “‘A conservator is a fiduciary. . . .’” whose duties “‘are clearly defined in . . . [Conn. Gen. Stat.] § 45a–656, which prescribes the duties of a conservator of the person.’” (quoting Probate of Marcus, 199 Conn. 524, 533 (1986

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dipentima, Bear, Borden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.