Kuykendall v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the purpose of NRS 176.055(1) is “to ensure that all time served is credited towards a defendant’s ultimate sentence”
• addressing caselaw regarding whether mandatory credit for presentence incarceration is predicated upon indigency
• despite the discretionary language of NRS 176.055(1), its purpose is to ensure that defendants are awarded credit for all time served

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gaines v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2000-03-13· cited 66×
• Haney v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2008-06-12· cited 27×
• Johnson v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2004-05-19· cited 12×
• State v. Second Judicial District Court
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2005-08-11· cited 10×
• Nieto v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2003-06-11· cited 9×
• POASA (UPUTAUA) VS. STATE
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2019-11-27· cited 2×
• WHITE-HUGHLEY (TYERRE) VS. STATE
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2021-09-16

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Tate v. Short
  Supreme Court· 1971-03-02· cited 837×
• In Re Kapperman
  California Supreme Court· 1974-05-23· cited 192×
• People v. Riolo
  California Supreme Court· 1983-01-10· cited 38×
• Commonwealth v. Grant
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1974-10-09· cited 30×
• Anglin v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1974-07-26· cited 26×
• Milladge v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1995-08-14· cited 13×