Kuehne v. Huff (In Re Huff)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the provision corresponding to § 523(a)(2)(a) in the Bankruptcy Act was interpreted as requiring the false pretenses to be proved by clear and convincing evidence
• “Where dishonesty or fraud is at issue, the courts have typically required a higher standard of proof.”
• nondischargeability proceeding under Bankruptcy Act of 1898

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).