Skip to main content
· 6/18/1997

Rupert v. Krautheimer (In Re Krautheimer)

Citations

  • 210 B.R. 37
  • 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 882
  • 1997 WL 356264

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that a bankruptcy court has the “broad ability and obligation to review all material in the record of relevance to the dischargeability of a debt”
  • reasoning that a bankruptcy court has the “broad ability and obligation to review all material in the record of relevance to the dischargeability of a debt”
  • court must satisfy itself by scrutinizing entire record of prior proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John J. Connelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.