· 6/18/1997
Rupert v. Krautheimer (In Re Krautheimer)
Citations
- 210 B.R. 37
- 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 882
- 1997 WL 356264
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that a bankruptcy court has the “broad ability and obligation to review all material in the record of relevance to the dischargeability of a debt”
- reasoning that a bankruptcy court has the “broad ability and obligation to review all material in the record of relevance to the dischargeability of a debt”
- court must satisfy itself by scrutinizing entire record of prior proceeding
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: John J. Connelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.