Car Village Buick-Opel, Inc. v. DeRosa (In Re DeRosa)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Conflicting inferences can be drawn from the facts ... so that it cannot be said that, as a matter of law, the Debtor’s conduct was malicious.”
• “the requisite fraudulent intent must be shown to have existed at the time the debtor obtained the money, property, services or extension, renewal or refinance of credit”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).