Tompkins v. Washington Hospital Center

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, where one party filed a second motion for summary judgment, the non-moving party was entitled to the statutorily-required notice period for responding to such a motion where “there were significant differences between the first and second motions”
• court must determine whether prevailing party legally entitled to judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).