W.D. Texas· 10/21/2002
Krim v. pcOrder.com, Inc.
Citations
- 210 F.R.D. 581
- 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20186
- 2002 WL 31415403
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In undertaking an inquiry into adequacy, the Court considers the conflicts of interest of the class counsel, as well as the class representatives.”
- An adequate class representative should have “commendable familiarity with the complaint and the concept of a class action.” (quoting Horton v. Goose Creek Independent School District, 690 F.2d 470, 484 (5th Cir. 1982)
- An adequate class representative should have “commendable familiarity with the complaint and the concept of a class action.” (quoting Horton v. Goose Creek Independent School District, 690 F.2d 470, 484 (5th Cir. 1982)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sparks
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Krim v. pcOrder.com, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2005-03-01· cited 145×
- In re Initial Public Offering Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2004-10-13· cited 58×
- In Re Enron Corp. SecuritiesS.D. Texas· 2006-06-05· cited 55×
- In Re Royal Ahold N v. Securities & Erisa LitigationD. Maryland· 2004-12-21· cited 48×
- Shiring v. Tier Technologies, Inc.E.D. Virginia· 2007-07-23· cited 28×
- In Re Alamosa Holdings, Inc. Securities LitigationN.D. Texas· 2005-03-28· cited 21×
- Freeland v. Iridium World Communications, Ltd.D.C. Circuit· 2006-01-09· cited 18×
- Ruppert v. Alliant Energy Cash Balance Pension PlanW.D. Wisconsin· 2009-02-12· cited 11×
- In re Kosmos Energy Ltd. Securities LitigationN.D. Texas· 2014-03-19· cited 11×
- Ogden v. AmeriCredit Corp.N.D. Texas· 2005-01-05· cited 9×
- In re Fleetboston Financial Corp. Securities LitigationD. New Jersey· 2008-10-20· cited 7×
- Ruderman v. Washington National InsuranceS.D. Florida· 2010-01-05· cited 6×
- In re Northwestern Corp. Securities LitigationD. South Dakota· 2003-10-15· cited 1×
- Lebeau v. United StatesD. South Dakota· 2004-02-10· cited 1×
- Unnamed caseFirst Circuit· 2005-03-01
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court· 1975-10-06· cited 2,261×
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court· 1995-02-28· cited 1,256×
- Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyFifth Circuit· 1996-05-23· cited 871×
- Berger v. Compaq Computer Corp.Fifth Circuit· 2001-07-25· cited 158×
- Joseph v. WilesTenth Circuit· 2000-08-04· cited 153×
- Kayes v. Pacific Lumber Co.Ninth Circuit· 1995-04-10· cited 86×
- Hertzberg v. Dignity Partners, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1999-08-27· cited 78×
- Sullivan v. Chase Investment Services of Boston, Inc.N.D. California· 1978-06-06· cited 78×
- Kurczi v. Eli Lilly & Co.N.D. Ohio· 1995-02-27· cited 43×
- Kelley v. Mid-America Racing Stables, Inc.W.D. Oklahoma· 1990-02-13· cited 33×
- Columbia General Investment Corporation v. Securities and Exchange CommissionFifth Circuit· 1959-04-06· cited 24×
- Kirkwood v. TaylorD. Minnesota· 1984-06-06· cited 21×
- Lee v. Ernst & Young, LLPEighth Circuit· 2002-06-18· cited 18×
- Tedesco v. MishkinS.D. New York· 1988-06-10· cited 18×
- Chateau De Ville Productions, Inc. v. Tams-Witmark Music Library, Inc.S.D. New York· 1979-07-07· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.