Chateau de Ville Productions, Inc. v. Tams-Witmark Music Library, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that although district court found for plaintiff on number of different federal and state law claims, plaintiff was entitled to only one recovery for its one loss
• holding that evidence found in defendant’s warehouse was adequately authenticated simply by its being found there
• Washington State would apply federal law because the state securities act provides that it is to be coordinated with related federal law
• holding the undisputed facts that the author of a treatise was “the preeminent industry expert” and that a company “required its salesmen to read the books and to recommend them to investors” was sufficient to “substantiate the idea that the books were accepted authority”
• “A person possesses the requisite scienter if the person either deliberately misrepresents or omits material information.”
• attorney may waive client’s right to raise error on appeal by eliciting inadmissible evidence himself

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).