Kramer v. Kramer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the FFCCSOA to a different issue under the theory that it preempts state law, without describing the nature of any conflict

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Woodward v. Berkery
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-02-04· cited 29×
• Trissler v. Trissler
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-07-25· cited 10×
• Pulkkinen v. Pulkkinen
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-11-26· cited 7×
• Department of Revenue v. Cascella
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-17· cited 4×
• STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE v. Hylton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-12-31· cited 3×
• Gropper v. Gropper
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-02-02· cited 2×
• Bouquety v. Bouquety
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-06-28· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Newburgh v. Arrigo
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1982-02-23· cited 193×
• Manno v. Manno
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1993-08-02· cited 79×
• State, Dept. of Revenue v. Fleet
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-08-28· cited 16×
• State, Dept. of Rev. v. Skladanuk
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-11-27· cited 9×
• Harbour v. Harbour
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1996-06-28· cited 5×