Harbour v. Harbour

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court had authority to make Mississippi judgment executory, but did not have subject matter jurisdiction to modify the support order.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re the Marriage of Hillstrom
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2005-11-03· cited 305×
• Bordelon v. Dehnert
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2000-09-22· cited 14×
• Kerr-McGee Corp. v. McNamara
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2001-06-22· cited 9×
• Kramer v. Kramer
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-08-27· cited 7×
• State v. Boyd
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2013-05-16· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Haydel v. Hercules Transport, Inc.
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1995-04-07· cited 31×
• DeHaven v. DeHaven
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1982-03-01· cited 13×
• Patterson v. Patterson
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1983-06-28· cited 9×
• A Second Mortgage Co. of Baton Rouge v. Gatlin
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1970-03-09· cited 9×
• Bednarsh v. Bednarsh
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1995-03-09· cited 7×
• In re Terry
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1988-06-07· cited 2×
• State v. Cross
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1995-05-16· cited 1×