Trissler v. Trissler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying section 88.6111(1) to require a circuit court to exercise jurisdiction where the petitioner was not a Florida resident
• noting statutory requirements for Florida’s modification of another state’s child support order similar to those required under UIFSA
• where both parents resided in Florida when Pennsylvania child support order was registered there, mother’s subsequent move out of state did not affect ability of Florida courts to modify the Pennsylvania child support order
• where both parents resided in Florida when Pennsylvania child support order was registered there, mother’s subsequent move out of state did not affect ability of Florida courts to modify the Pennsylvania child support order
• where both parents resided in Florida when Pennsylvania child support order was registered there, mother’s subsequent move out of state did not affect ability of Florida courts to modify the Pennsylvania child support order
• “In this case, it is undisputed that none of the parties or the children have resided in [the issuing State] since 2001. As a result, [the issuing State] lost ‘continuing, exclusive jurisdiction’ over the child support matter”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).