Kotvan v. Kirk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a “/trial court has discretion to limit the number of witnesses”
• It was not error for the trial court to limit witness’s testimony at trial where court had denied motion in limine to limit testimony based on opposing party’s assertions as to scope of testimony
• “ ‘Preservation of a question for review requires an appropriate objection in the court below [citation], and failure to object constitutes waiver.’ Williams-burg Village Owners’ Ass’n v. Lauder Associates, 200 Ill. App. 3d 474, 479, 558 N.E.2d 208[, 210-11] (1990)”
• It was not error for the trial court to limit witness's testimony at trial where court had denied motion in limine to limit testimony based on opposing party's assertions as to scope of testimony
• “ ‘Preservation of a question for review requires an appropriate objection in the court below [citation], and failure to object constitutes waiver.’ Williamsburg Village Owners’ Ass’n v. Lauder Associates, 200 Ill. App. 3d 474, 479 *** (1990)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).