Krklus v. Stanley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the trial court did not err in allowing the defendants to introduce evidence in support of their comparative negligence defense or in instructing the jury that it could consider comparative negligence and affirming the jury verdict in favor of the defendants
• a trial court appropriately instructed a jury on contributory negligence in a medical malpractice suit where a patient failed to follow a doctor’s advice
• error in decision to admit or exclude evidence is harmless unless resulted in prejudice
• claim that evidence was improperly admitted at trial rejected, in part, where appellant “actually interjected the matter into trial for the first time in her case in chief during direct examination”
• error in decision to admit or exclude evidence is harmless unless resulted in prejudice
• when there is a general verdict after more than one theory has been presented to a jury, the verdict will be upheld on appeal if there was sufficient evidence to sustain any of the theories presented

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).