Senderak v. Mitchell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, under Illinois law, a parent cannot seeks damages based on alleged loss of future unborn children as such an award is too speculative
• the fact that physician had not performed procedure for several years goes to the weight of his testimony, not to its admissibility
• where the court does not state its reasons for granting a new trial, we look to the posttrial motions and assume the errors stated there prompted the order
• the fact that physician had not performed procedure for several years goes to the weight of his testimony, not to its admissibility
• where the court does not state its reasons for granting a new trial, we look to the posttrial motions and assume the errors stated there prompted the order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).