Sixth Circuit· 1/18/2006

Kottmyer v. Maas

Citations

436 F.3d 684
2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 1075

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the court “need not accept as true ... unwarranted factual inferences”
noting that “the right to family integrity, while critically important, is neither absolute nor unqualified”
noting that, while “the Supreme Court has yet to articulate the parameters of this right[,]” it is “clear that the right to family integrity, while critically important, is neither absolute nor unqualified”
affirming dismissal where “[n]othing in [the plaintiff’s] complaint suggests that” the defendant-hospitals were state actors
\[T]he parent-child relation gives rise to a liberty interest that a parent may not be deprived of absent due process of law.\
allegation that hospital was subject to state licensing was insufficient to support finding it was acting under color of state law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.