Ansfield v. Omnicare, Inc. (In Re Omicare, Inc. Securities Litigation)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that any purported knowledge on the part of executives not alleged to have participated in formulating the challenged statements cannot support scienter
• holding that, “if public records refute a plaintiff’s claim, a defendant may attach those documents to its motion to dismiss, and a court can then consider them in resolving the Rule 12(b)(6
• holding that a court may take judicial notice of the existence of SEC filings but “could not consider the statements contained in [SEC filings] for the truth of the matter asserted” at the motion to dismiss stage
• noting that a subsequent case’s “qualifi[cation]” of “overly broad language” and “clarification of the standard” from a previous case does not violate the prior-panel rule
• finding that judicial notice “applies to appellate courts taking judicial notice of facts supported by documents not included in the record on appeal”
• noting that Federal Rule of Evidence 201 allows courts to take notice “of facts not subject to reasonable dispute”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).