Skip to main content
Third Circuit· 7/29/2002

Kool, Mann, Coffee Co. v. Coffey

Citations

  • 300 F.3d 340
  • 44 V.I. 419
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 15237
  • 2002 WL 1747520

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that discounted cash flow analyses are imprecise and have value only “in certain limited situations”
  • ruling that such statements, as dicta, are not binding
  • “[I]n reviewing the bankruptcy court’s factual findings we are to give due regard to the opportunity of that court to judge first-hand the credibility of witnesses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ambro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.