Skip to main content
N.D. Georgia· 8/13/2009

Kipperman v. Onex Corp.

Citations

  • 411 B.R. 805
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71666
  • 2009 WL 2515664

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Georgia law and finding date of injury is date party incurs obligation to pay
  • \[A]n expert's training does not always need to be narrowly tailored to match the exact point of dispute in a case.\
  • ‘‘[A]n expert’s training does not always need to be narrowly tailored to match the exact point of dispute in a case.”
  • “In determining whether the circumstantial evidence supports an inference of fraudulent intent, courts may look to a number of badges of fraud.”
  • “Courts will not look with hindsight at a transaction because such an approach could transform fraudulent conveyance law into an insurance policy for creditors.”
  • “Georgia prohibits fraudulent transfers which occurred prior to July 1, 2002, under OCGA § 18-2-22, and transfers which occurred after July 1, 2002, under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer[s] Act codified in OCGA §§ 18-2-70, et seq.” (citation and footnote omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: J. Owen Forrester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

137 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Kipperman v. Onex Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.