Skip to main content
· 8/31/1993

Moore, Owen, Thomas & Company v. L. Coleman Coffey and Robert Bruce Coffey, and L. Coleman Coffey and Robert Bruce Coffey v. Thomas O. Moore

Citations

  • 992 F.2d 1439

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the district court “has the discretion to refuse the filing of untimely affidavits”
  • finding that plaintiffs “were aware, or at least should have been aware,” of defendant’s affirmative defense raised for the first time in his response to summary judgment motion and “in his affidavit in opposition to the . . . motion”
  • single affidavit concerning state of mind created factual issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy, Milburn, Krupansky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.