Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Federal Claims· 8/29/2002

Koby v. United States

Citations

  • 53 Fed. Cl. 493
  • 90 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6197
  • 2002 U.S. Claims LEXIS 229
  • 2002 WL 2001230

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Accordingly, courts have been reluctant to require parties, under the duty to mitigate, to deal further with the breaching party----”
  • “[T]he breaching party must show that reasonable possibilities for mitigation existed and were ignored”
  • “[RJeasonable conduct is to be determined from all the facts and circumstances of each case, and must be judged in the light of one viewing the situation at the time the problem was presented”
  • “While reasonable cost-avoiding steps include affirmative efforts to make substitute arrangements compensating for the lack of contract performance, such arrangements need not be entered into if they would expose the party to undue risk or significantly compromise its interests”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allegra

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Koby v. United States

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.